- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-538/14: Action brought on 16 July 2014 — Peri v OHIM (Multiprop)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TN0538
62014TN0538
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
22.9.2014
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 329/22
(Case T-538/14)
2014/C 329/31
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Peri GmbH (Weißenhorn, Germany) (represented by M. Eck and A. Bognár, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 29 April 2014 in Case R 1661/2013-1;
—Order OHIM to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘Multiprop’ for goods and services in Classes 6, 19 and 37 — Community trade mark application No 1 1 5 87 219
Decision of the Examiner: the application was rejected
Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed
Pleas in law:
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of Article 7(2) of Regulation No 207/2009