EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Opinion of Mr Advocate General Jacobs delivered on 16 January 1997. # Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium. # Failure by a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 91/659/EEC - Failure to implement. # Case C-135/96.

ECLI:EU:C:1997:24

61996CC0135

January 16, 1997
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Important legal notice

61996C0135

European Court reports 1997 Page I-01061

Opinion of the Advocate-General

1 In these proceedings the Commission seeks a declaration, under Article 169 of the Treaty, that the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to comply with its obligations under the Treaty by not adopting within the prescribed period the measures necessary to implement Commission Directive 91/659/EEC of 3 December 1991 adapting to technical progress Annex I to Council Directive 76/769/EEC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations (asbestos). (1)

2 Article 2 of the directive provides that:

`1. Member States shall adopt and publish the provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by 1 January 1993 and shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof. They shall apply these provisions as from 1 July 1993.

2. Member States shall communicate to the Commission no later than 18 months after the date of its adoption the text of the basic provisions of national law which they adopt in the field covered by this Directive.'

3 Belgium has not disputed its failure to implement the Directive. It states in the defence that the necessary measures are under way.

4 It follows that the Commission is entitled to the declaration which it seeks.

Conclusion

Accordingly I am of the opinion that the Court should:

(1) declare that, by failing to adopt within the prescribed period the provisions necessary to implement Commission Directive 91/659/EEC, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Treaty;

(2) order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs of these proceedings.

(1) - OJ 1991 L 363, p. 36.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia