- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-552/14: Action brought on 22 July 2014 — Wm. Wrigley Jr. v OHIM (Extra)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TN0552
62014TN0552
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
6.10.2014
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 351/15
(Case T-552/14)
2014/C 351/18
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Wm. Wrigley Jr. Company (Wilmington, United States) (represented by: M. Kinkeldey, S. Brandstätter and C. Schmitt, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Annul the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 19 May 2014 given in Case R 199/2014-5.
Pleas in law and main arguments
Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark containing the verbal element ‘Extra’ for goods in Classes 3, 21 and 30 — Community trade mark application No 1 1 7 37 582
Decision of the Examiner: Rejected the CTM application
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) CTMR.