- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-69/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Brugge (Belgium), lodged on 16 February 2011 — Connoisseur Belgium BVBA v Belgische Staat
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011CN0069
62011CN0069
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
14.5.2011
Official Journal of the European Union
C 145/8
(Case C-69/11)
2011/C 145/11
Language of the case: Dutch
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Connoisseur Belgium BVBA
Defendant: Belgische Staat
Question referred
Does Article 26 of the Wetboek van de BTW (the Belgian VAT Code) infringe Article 11.A(1)(a) of the Sixth VAT Directive, now incorporated in Article 73 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, and the principle of the neutrality of VAT, if that provision is interpreted as meaning that VAT is due on costs or amounts which could contractually be charged to the other contracting party but which are not so charged?
(1) Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1).
(2) OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.