- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-114/20: Judgment of the General Court of 17 March 2021 — Alvargonzález Ramos v EUIPO — Ursus-3 Capital, A.V. (URSUS Kapital) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU figurative mark URSUS Kapital — Genuine use of the mark — Partial revocation — Article 18(1) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Proof of genuine use — Assessment of the evidence — Classification of the services)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TA0114
62020TA0114
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 189/17
(Case T-114/20) (*)
(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU figurative mark URSUS Kapital - Genuine use of the mark - Partial revocation - Article 18(1) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Proof of genuine use - Assessment of the evidence - Classification of the services)
(2021/C 189/19)
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: Pablo Erik Alvargonzález Ramos (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: E. Sugrañes Coca, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Palmero Cabezas, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Ursus-3 Capital, A.V., SA (Madrid)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 December 2019 (Case R 711/2019-5), relating to revocation proceedings between Ursus-3 Capital, A.V. and Mr Alvargonzález Ramos.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Mr Pablo Erik Alvargonzález Ramos to pay the costs.
(*)
Language of the case: Spanish.
OJ C 129, 20.4.2020.