- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-487/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia (Romania) lodged on 2 October 2020 — Philips Orăștie S.R.L. v Direcția Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020CN0487
62020CN0487
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
14.12.2020
Official Journal of the European Union
C 433/34
(Case C-487/20)
(2020/C 433/42)
Language of the case: Romanian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Philips Orăștie S.R.L.
Defendant: Direcția Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili
Question referred
May the provisions of [the first paragraph of] Article 179 and [the first paragraph of] Article 183 of Directive 112/2006/EC (1), regard being had to the principles of equivalence, effectiveness and neutrality, be interpreted as precluding national legislation or practices in accordance with which the amount of VAT to be refunded is reduced by including in the calculation of the VAT due amounts representing additional liabilities established in a notice of assessment that has been annulled by a judgment that is not yet final, where such additional liabilities are guaranteed by a bank guarantee and the national tax procedure rules recognise that such a guarantee has the effect of staying enforcement in the case of other taxes and duties?
(1) Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).