- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-739/18: Action brought on 17 December 2018 — Darment v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TN0739
62018TN0739
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
25.2.2019
Official Journal of the European Union
C 72/34
(Case T-739/18)
(2019/C 72/43)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Darment Oy (Helsinki, Finland) (represented by: C. Ginter, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the Commission decision to reduce the quota allocated to the applicant for the year 2019 for the placing of hydrofluorocarbons on the market about which the applicant was informed by the letter of 16 October 2018 Ares(2018)5305174 and email of 12 December 2018;
—order the defendant to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging infringement of Regulation (EU) 517/2014 (1) from the defendant, by applying Article 25(2) strictly based on the data available in the registry set up under Article 17, even though a claim has been raised to correct the erroneous data in the registry.
2.Second plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment from the defendant for refusing to consider the applicant’s explanations regarding placement of quota for bulk import on the market.
(1) Regulation (EU) No 517/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on fluorinated greenhouse gases and repealing Regulation (EC) No 842/2006, OJ L 150, 20.05.2014, p. 150.