- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-380/25: Action brought on 10 June 2025 – Pangeanic B I Europa v HADEA
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62025TN0380
62025TN0380
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2025/4065
28.7.2025
(Case T-380/25)
(C/2025/4065)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Pangeanic B I Europa, SL (Valencia, Spain) (represented by: S. Deswert and L. Hoffreumon, lawyers)
Defendant: European Health and Digital Executive Agency
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Declare that the defendant has breached certain articles of the grant agreements concluded with the applicant;
—Declare that the defendant, in application of the grant agreements, has breached Decision C (2016) 478 of 3 February 2016 on the reimbursement of personnel costs of beneficiaries of the Connecting Europe Facility;
—Acknowledge that the applicant has duly fulfilled its obligations and correctly implemented the actions under the grant agreements, and that the applicant is entitled to full payment of the grant amount;
—By consequence, condemn the defendant to withdraw its payment order; not to issue any further payment order, nor to take any further recovery action;
—In addition, taking into account the judgment to be issued, order the defendant to extend and take any necessary additional actions to implement the judgment, in relation to the audit of the eligible costs declared by applicant in accordance with the grant agreements;
—In any case, condemn the defendant to the costs and expenses of the case, including the applicant’s legal fees.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging breach of articles II.19.1, II.19.2 (a) of the grant agreements and Decision (2016) 478 of 3 February 2016 on the reimbursement of personnel costs of beneficiaries of the Connecting Europe Facility.
2.Second plea in law, alleging breach of article II.9.1 to the grant agreements by the defendant (costs related to subcontracting).
3.Third plea in law, alleging breach of article II.27.5, II.27.6, and II.27.7 of the grant agreements by the defendant (audit procedure).
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4065/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—