I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2022/C 380/31)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Sastela, proizvodnja peciva in tort, d.o.o. (Ljutomer, Slovenia) (represented by: U. Pogačnik, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Zenergo d.o.o. (Zgornja Polskava, Slovenia)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark Tante Mitzi Caffè CAFFÈ — STRUDEL — BARETTO — European Union trade mark No 11 425 394
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 June 2022 in Case R 1413/2021-2
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—uphold the application in this case, reform the contested decision to uphold its appeal to the Board of Appeal and reform the decision of the cancellation division to the effect of setting aside the revocation of the contested trade mark;
—in the alternative, annul the contested decision and remit the case to EUIPO for further deliberation;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article 58(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.