EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-628/22: Order of the General Court of 21 June 2023 — Repasi v Commission (Action for annulment — Environment — Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1214 — Taxonomy — Economic activities relating to fossil gas and nuclear energy — Inclusion in sustainable economic activities — Member of the European Parliament — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TB0628

62022TB0628

June 21, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

7.8.2023

Official Journal of the European Union

C 278/22

(Case T-628/22) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(Action for annulment - Environment - Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1214 - Taxonomy - Economic activities relating to fossil gas and nuclear energy - Inclusion in sustainable economic activities - Member of the European Parliament - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility)

(2023/C 278/33)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: René Repasi (Karlsruhe, Germany) (represented by: H.-G. Kamann, D. Fouquet, lawyers, F. Kainer and M. Nettesheim, professors)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Erlbacher, A. Nijenhuis and G. von Rintelen, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1214 of 9 March 2022 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2139 as regards economic activities in certain energy sectors and Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178 as regards specific public disclosures for those economic activities (OJ 2022 L 188, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2.There is no longer any need to rule on the application for leave to intervene submitted by the French Republic.

3.The applicant shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

4.The French Republic shall bear its own costs.

(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 24, 23.1.2023.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia