- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-586/16: Judgment of the General Court of 14 November 2017 — Vincenti v EUIPO (Civil service — Officials — Promotion — 2015 promotion exercise — Lack of staff reports as a result of sick leave — General provisions for implementing Article 45 of the Staff Regulations)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TA0586
62016TA0586
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 5/35
(Case T-586/16) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((Civil service - Officials - Promotion - 2015 promotion exercise - Lack of staff reports as a result of sick leave - General provisions for implementing Article 45 of the Staff Regulations))
(2018/C 005/47)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Guillaume Vincenti (Alicante, Spain) (represented by: H. Tettenborn, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: K. Tóth and A. Lukošiūtė, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of EUIPO of 24 July 2015 not to promote the applicant to the next grade (AST 8) in the 2015 promotion procedure by not including his name on the list of officials promoted in the 2015 promotion exercise.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 24 July 2015 establishing the list of officials promoted in the 2015 promotion exercise in so far as Mr Guillaume Vincenti was not taken into consideration for the 2015 promotion exercise;
2.Orders EUIPO to pay the costs.
(<span class="note"> <a id="ntr1-C_2018005EN.01003502-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2018005EN.01003502-E0001">*1</a> </span>) OJ C 191, 30.5.2016 (Case initially registered before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal as Case F-16/16 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1 September 2016).
* * *