- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-828/22: Judgment of the General Court of 2 October 2024 – ACE v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Prohibition on the provision of legal advisory services to the Russian Government and entities established in Russia – Obligation to state reasons – Fundamental role of lawyers in a democratic society – Right of lawyers to provide legal advisory services – Right to be advised by a lawyer – Articles 47 and 52(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TA0828
62022TA0828
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2024/6936
25.11.2024
(Case T-828/22)
(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine - Prohibition on the provision of legal advisory services to the Russian Government and entities established in Russia - Obligation to state reasons - Fundamental role of lawyers in a democratic society - Right of lawyers to provide legal advisory services - Right to be advised by a lawyer - Articles 47 and 52(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights)
(C/2024/6936)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: ACE-Avocats, ensemble (Paris, France) (represented by: J.-P. Hordies, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: D. Laurent and M.-C. Cadilhac, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the applicant: Lupicinio Rodríguez Jiménez (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J. Iriarte Ángel, E. Delage González, M. Casado Abarquero and F. Rodríguez González, lawyers)
Interveners in support of the defendant: Republic of Estonia (represented by: M. Kriisa, acting as Agent), European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland, C. Giolito, M. Carpus Carcea and C. Georgieva, acting as Agents)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Article 1(12) of Council Regulation (EU) 2022/1904 of 6 October 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 255 I, p. 3), to the extent that it amends Article 5n(1), (2) and (5) of Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 of 31 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2014 L 229, p. 1) in so far as it concerns the applicant.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders ACE-Avocats, ensemble to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union;
3.Orders Mr Lupicinio Rodríguez Jiménez, the Republic of Estonia and the European Commission to bear their own costs.
*
Language of the case: French.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6936/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
ECLI:EU:C:2025:140
15
* * *