- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-47/13: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 12 December 2013 — JJ (*) v Council (Civil service — Officials — Promotion — 2012 promotion procedure — Decision not to promote the applicant — Interinstitutional transfer in the course of the promotion procedure preceding that during which a promotion decision would have taken effect — Institution which is competent to take a decision on promotion of the transferred official)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013FB0047
62013FB0047
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
8.3.2014
Official Journal of the European Union
C 71/36
Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 12 December 2013 — JJ v Council
(Case F-47/13)
(Civil service - Officials - Promotion - 2012 promotion procedure - Decision not to promote the applicant - Interinstitutional transfer in the course of the promotion procedure preceding that during which a promotion decision would have taken effect - Institution which is competent to take a decision on promotion of the transferred official)
(2014/C 71/72)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: JJ (represented by: M. Velardo, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and A. Bisch, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of the decision not to include the applicant in the list of officials in function group AD proposed for promotion in 2012.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as being manifestly devoid of any basis in law.
2.JJ shall bear his own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union.
Information erased or replaced within the framework of protection of personal data and/or confidentiality.
OJ C 207, 20.7.2013, p. 63.