Official Journal of the European Union

EN

C series

—

C/2025/3547

7.7.2025

(Case T-300/25)

(C/2025/3547)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: JD (represented by: S. Pappas and D.-A. Pappa, lawyers)

Defendant: European External Action Service

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—annul the decision of the Secretary General of the European External Action Service (EEAS) of 8 May 2024 by which it was imposed on the applicant the penalty of a monthly withholding of EUR 500 from her retirement pension, for a period of two years; and

—annul the decision No. Ares(2025)885826 of the EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy of 5 February 2025 by which the applicant’s complaint submitted pursuant to Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulation of the European Union (‘the Staff Regulation’) against this penalty was finally rejected;

—order the defendant to bear its costs as well as the applicant’s costs for the current proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on six pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging that neither Article 12 nor Article 12a of the Staff Regulation could serve in the present case as a legal basis.

2.Second plea in law, alleging an infringement of the rights of defence.

3.Third plea in law, alleging that the contested acts are insufficiently reasoned and based on wrong assumptions leading to manifest errors of assessment.

4.Fourth plea in law, alleging an infringement of Article 9 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulation.

5.Fifth plea in law, alleging an infringement of Article 10 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulation.

6.Sixth plea in law, alleging an infringement of the principle of proportionality.

—

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3547/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

—