- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-98/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 24 February 2012 — Wim J. J. Slot v 3 H Camping-Center Heinsberg GmbH
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012CN0098
62012CN0098
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
28.4.2012
Official Journal of the European Union
C 126/9
(Case C-98/12)
2012/C 126/17
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Wim J. J. Slot
Respondent: 3 H Camping-Center Heinsberg GmbH
Questions referred
1.Is there a matter relating to a consumer contract within the meaning of Article 15(1)(c) of Regulation No 44/2001 if a trader has, by the design of his website, directed his activities to another Member State and a consumer domiciled in the territory of that Member State, on the basis of the information on the trader’s website, travels to where his business is located and the parties sign the contract there, or does Article 15(1)(c) of Regulation No 44/2001 presuppose in that case that a distance contract is concluded?
2.If Article 15(1)(c) of Regulation No 44/2001 is to be interpreted as meaning that in that case the contract must in principle be a distance contract: Does the consumer jurisdiction under Article 15(1)(c) in conjunction with Article 16(2) of Regulation No 44/2001 apply if the parties to the contract enter into a distance pre-contractual commitment which subsequently flows directly into the conclusion of the contract?
Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters, OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1.