- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-496/22, Brink’s Cash Solutions: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 October 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti — Romania) — EI v SC Brink’s Cash Solutions SRL (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to collective redundancies — Directive 98/59/EC — The first subparagraph of Article 1(1)(b) and Article 6 — Procedure for informing and consulting workers in the event of projected collective redundancies — No workers’ representatives appointed — National legislation allowing an employer not to inform and consult the workers concerned individually)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CA0496
62022CA0496
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
Series C
C/2023/732
(Case C-496/22, (1) Brink’s Cash Solutions)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social policy - Approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to collective redundancies - Directive 98/59/EC - The first subparagraph of Article 1(1)(b) and Article 6 - Procedure for informing and consulting workers in the event of projected collective redundancies - No workers’ representatives appointed - National legislation allowing an employer not to inform and consult the workers concerned individually)
(C/2023/732)
Language of the case: Romanian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: EI
Respondent: SC Brink’s Cash Solutions SRL
Operative part of the judgment
The first subparagraph of Article 1(1)(b), Article 2(3) and Article 6 of Council Directive 98/59/EC of 20 July 1998 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to collective redundancies, as amended by Directive (EU) 2015/1794 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 October 2015,
must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which does not require an employer to consult individually the workers affected by projected collective redundancies, where those workers have not appointed workers’ representatives, and which does not require those workers to appoint such representatives, provided that that legislation makes it possible, in circumstances beyond the control of those workers, to guarantee the full effect of those provisions of Directive 98/59, as amended.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/732/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
*
Language of the case: Romanian.
* * *