- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-26/20: Action brought on 16 January 2020 – Forex Bank v EUIPO – Coino UK (FOREX)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TN0026
62020TN0026
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 68/68
—
(Case T-26/20)
(2020/C 68/76)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Forex Bank AB (Stockholm, Sweden) (represented by: A. Jute, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Coino UK Ltd (London, United Kingdom)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark FOREX – European Union trade mark No 4 871 836
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 October 2019 in Case R 2460/2018-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—annul the Cancellation Division’s decision;
—order that the European Union trade mark No 4 871 836 remains in force;
—order the EUIPO to bear the applicant’s costs of the proceedings before the Cancellation Division, the Boards of Appeal, as well as the General Court with an amount to be specified later.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
—