- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Order of the Court (Second Chamber) of 3 March 2011. # Centre de Coordination Carrefour SNC v European Commission. # Appeal - Aid scheme in favour of coordination centres established in Belgium - Conditions of admissibility of an action for annulment - Concept of 'interest in bringing proceedings' - Res judicata. # Case C-254/10 P.
ECLI:EU:C:2011:120
62010CO0254
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-254/10 P)
Appeal – Aid scheme in favour of coordination centres established in Belgium – Conditions of admissibility of an action for annulment – Concept of ‘interest in bringing proceedings’ – Res judicata
Appeals – Grounds – Mistaken assessment of the facts – Inadmissibility – review by the Court of the assessment made of the evidence – Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58(1)) (see paras 36-38)
Re:
Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 March 2010 – Case T-94/08 Centre de Coordination Carrefour v Commission, by which that Court dismissed as inadmissible the applicant’s action seeking annulment of Commission Decision 2008/283/EC of 13 November 2007 amending Decision 2003/757/EC on the aid scheme implemented by Belgium for coordination centres established in Belgium (OJ 2008 L 90, p. 7) – Conditions of admissibility of an action for annulment – Concept of interest in bringing proceedings – Res judicata.
Operative Part:
1.The appeal is dismissed.
2.The Centre de Coordination Carrefour SNC is ordered to bear the costs.