- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-307/17: Action brought on 18 May 2017 — adidas v EUIPO — Shoe Branding Europe (Representation of three parallel stripes)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TN0307
62017TN0307
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 231/48
(Case T-307/17)
(2017/C 231/61)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: adidas AG (Herzogenaurach, Germany) (represented by: I. Fowler and I. Junkar, Solicitors)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Shoe Branding Europe BVBA (Oudenaarde, Belgium)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark (Representation of three parallel stripes) — EU trade mark No 12 442 166
Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 March 2017 in Case R 1515/2016-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal, if it joins as intervener, to pay the costs.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 52(2) read in conjunction with Article 7(3) of Regulation No 207/2009.