- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-355/16: Action brought on 1 July 2016 — adp Gauselmann v EUIPO (MULTI FRUITS)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0355
62016TN0355
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 296/40
(Case T-355/16)
(2016/C 296/51)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: adp Gauselmann GmbH (Espelkamp, Germany) (represented by: P. Koch Moreno, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark ‘MULTI FRUITS’ — Application for registration No 13 646 542
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 April 2016 in Case R 1043/2015-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—uphold the ground of appeal and annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 7(2) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) in conjunction with Article 7(2) of Regulation No 207/2009.