EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 10 January 1990. # Gebrüder Gausepohl v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas. # Reference for a preliminary ruling: Finanzgericht Hamburg - Germany. # Agriculture - Special export refunds for certain meat of bovine animals. # Case C-101/88.

ECLI:EU:C:1990:2

61988CJ0101

January 10, 1990
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Avis juridique important

61988J0101

European Court reports 1990 Page I-00023 Pub.RJ Page Pub somm

Summary

++++

Agriculture - Common organization of the markets - Meat of bovine animals - Export refunds - Special refunds for certain boned meat - Conditions for the grant thereof - Exportation of the total quantity of cuts from hindquarters of adult male cattle placed under supervision - Negligible part missing of no effect

( Commission Regulation No 1964/82, Art . 6(1 ) )

Summary

The first paragraph of Article 6 of Regulation No 1964/82 laying down the conditions for granting special export refunds on certain cuts of boned meat of bovine animals must be interpreted as meaning that the grant of the special refund is conditional on the exportation of the total quantity of pieces from hindquarters placed under supervision. However, the fact that a negligible part of that total quantity is missing does not, regard being had to the principle of proportionality and in the absence of bad faith by the trader, constitute sufficient grounds for considering that the condition relating to exportation has not been met with regard to the remainder of the meat.

Parties

In Case C-101/88

REFERENCE to the Court under Article 177 of the EEC Treaty by the Finanzgericht ( Finance Court ) Hamburg for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between

Firma Gebr . Gausepohl

and

Hauptzollamt ( Principal Customs Office ) Hamburg-Jonas,

on the interpretation of the first paragraph of Article 6 of Commission Regulation ( EEC ) No 1964/82 of 20 July 1982 laying down the conditions for granting special export refunds on certain cuts of boned meat of bovine animals ( Official Journal 1982, L 212, p . 48 ),

THE COURT ( Second Chamber )

composed of : F . A . Schockweiler, President of Chamber, G . F . Mancini and T . F . O' Higgins, Judges,

in answer to the questions referred to it by the Finanzgericht, Hamburg, by order of 14 December 1987, hereby rules :

Operative part

The first paragraph of Article 6 of Regulation ( EEC ) No 1964/82 is to be interpreted as meaning that the grant of the special refund is conditional on exportation of the total quantity of pieces from hindquarters placed under supervision. However, the fact that a negligible part of that total quantity is missing does not, in the absence of bad faith, constitute sufficient grounds for considering that the condition relating to exportation has not been met with regard to the remainder of the meat.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia