- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-434/19: Action brought on 25 June 2019 — Rosca v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TN0434
62019TN0434
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 295/56
(Case T-434/19)
(2019/C 295/73)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Ioana-Felicia Rosca (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: L. Tufler, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicants claim that the Court should:
—annul, first, the jury’s decision in Open Competition EPSO/AD/363/18 (AD7) — 2 (Administrators in field of taxation) to exclude the applicant from the next phase of the competition (Assessment Centre) following her request for review and, second, all the results of the phase Talent Screener;
—order the defendant to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 90 of the Staff Regulations.
2.Second plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 27 of the Staff Regulations.
3.Third plea in law, alleging breach of the principle of equal treatment between candidates during the selection process based on qualifications.