I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2022/C 368/48)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Multiópticas, S. Coop. (Colmenar Viejo, Spain) (represented by: M. López Camba and A. Lyubomirova Geleva, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Nike Innovate CV (Beaverton, Oregon, United States)
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark (Representation of two black geometrical shapes) — Application for registration No 18 154 653
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 June 2022 in Case R 1762/2021-4
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by the applicant;
—order Nike Innovate CV to pay the costs incurred by the applicant.
—Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.