- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-506/22: Judgment of the General Court of 29 November 2023 — CrossFit v EUIPO — Pitk Pelotas (CROSSWOD EQUIPMENT) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark CROSSWOD EQUIPMENT — Earlier EU word marks and international registration of a word mark CROSSFIT — Earlier EU word mark CROSS — Relative grounds for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Non-similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No damage to reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TA0506
62022TA0506
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
Series C
C/2024/734
(Case T-506/22) (*)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark CROSSWOD EQUIPMENT - Earlier EU word marks and international registration of a word mark CROSSFIT - Earlier EU word mark CROSS - Relative grounds for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Non-similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - No damage to reputation - Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001)
(C/2024/734)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: CrossFit LLC (Boulder, Colorado, United States) (represented by: D. Mărginean, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Pitk Pelotas, SL (Noain, Spain)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and the alteration of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 22 June 2022 (Case R 325/2021-1).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders CrossFit LLC and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear their own costs.
(*)
Language of the case: English.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/734/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
* * *