- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-777/17: Judgment of the General Court of 21 March 2019 –Pan v EUIPO — Entertainment One UK (TOBBIA) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark TOBBIA — Earlier EU figurative mark Peppa Pig — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TA0777
62017TA0777
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 155/42
(Case T-777/17) (*)
(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark TOBBIA - Earlier EU figurative mark Peppa Pig - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
(2019/C 155/50)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Xianhao Pan (Rome, Italy) (represented by: M. Oliva, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Entertainment One UK Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: J. Guise, L. Cassidy and N. Rose, Solicitors)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Astley Baker Davies Ltd (London, United Kingdom)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 September 2017 (Case R 1776/2016-1), relating to invalidity proceedings between, on the one hand, Entertainment One UK and Astley Baker Davies, and, on the other hand, Mr Xianhao.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Mr Xianhao Pan to pay the costs.
(*) Language of the case: English.
ECLI:EU:C:2019:140
* * *
(1) OJ C 22, 22.1.2018.