- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-309/18: Action brought on 17 May 2018 — Adis Higiene v EUIPO — Farecla Products (G3 EXTRA PLUS)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TN0309
62018TN0309
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-309/18)
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: Adis Higiene (Pozuelo de Alarcón, Spain) (represented by: M. Sanmartín Sanmartín, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Farecla Products Ltd (Ware, United Kingdom)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Word mark ‘G3 EXTRA PLUS’ — European Union trade mark No 15 064 207
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 March 2018 in Case R 2134/2017-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 42 of Regulation No 207/2009, read in conjunction with Rule 22 of Regulation No 2868/95;
—Infringement of Articles 94, 95 and 107 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
—Infringement of the obligation to state reasons.