- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-40/17: Order of the General Court of 20 September 2017 — Habermaaß v EUIPO (Here Global (h) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TB0040
62017TB0040
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 392/31
(Case T-40/17)(1)
((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))
(2017/C 392/40)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Habermaaß GmbH AG (Bad Rodach, Germany) (represented by: U. Blumenröder, H. Gauß and E. Bertram, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J.F. Crespo Carrillo and M. Tóhatí, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Here Global BV (Eindhoven, Netherlands) (represented by: J. Erkkilä, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 October 2016 (Case R 53/2016-2) concerning opposition proceedings between Here Global BV and Habermaaß GmbH.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.Habermaaß GmbH and Here Global BV shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).
(1)
OJ C 86, 20.3.2017.