- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-272/24, Tribunalul Galați: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel București (Romania) lodged on 17 April 2024 – HZ v Tribunalul Galați
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CN0272
62024CN0272
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2024/5491
23.9.2024
(Case C-272/24, Tribunalul Galați)
(C/2024/5491)
Language of the case: Romanian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: HZ
Respondent: Tribunalul Galați
Question referred
Must the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU, in conjunction with Article 2 TEU, points 5 and 7 of the Community Charter of the Fundamental Social Rights of Workers and Articles 3, 5, 6 and 7 of Directive 2003/88/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time, be interpreted, in circumstances such as those at issue in the main proceedings, as meaning that the principle of judicial independence precludes national legislation that prohibits the payment of overtime worked by a judge owing to staff shortages at the court where he or she works, in a situation in which compensation solely by time off in lieu corresponding to the amount of overtime worked outside normal working hours, and on weekly rest days and public holidays, if applied, would have a negative effect on the annual leave provided for by law?
—
(1) OJ 2003 L 299, p.9.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5491/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—