- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-1/12: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 15 April 2013 — Andersen v Court of Auditors (Civil service — Officials — Retirement on grounds of invalidity — Article 78 of the Staff Regulations — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012FB0001
62012FB0001
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 225/86
(Case F-1/12)(1)
(Civil service - Officials - Retirement on grounds of invalidity - Article 78 of the Staff Regulations - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
2013/C 225/198
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Henrik Andersen (Hals, Denmark) (represented by: S. Rodriguez. A. Blot and A. Tymen, lawyers)
Defendant: Court of Auditors of the European Union (represented by: T. Kennedy. N. Scafarto and B. Schäfer, Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of the decision of the Court of Auditors refusing to pay compensation for the loss purportedly suffered following the applicant’s retirement on grounds of invalidity.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.
2.Mr Andersen is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Court of Auditors of the European Union.
(1)
OJ C 133, 5.5.2012, p. 29.