- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-640/14: Order of the General Court of 23 November 2015 — Beul v Parliament and Council (Action for annulment — Functioning of financial markets — Regulation (EU) No 537/2014 — Legislative act — Lack of individual concern — Inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TB0640
62014TB0640
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
25.1.2016
Official Journal of the European Union
C 27/56
(Case T-640/14) (1)
((Action for annulment - Functioning of financial markets - Regulation (EU) No 537/2014 - Legislative act - Lack of individual concern - Inadmissibility))
(2016/C 027/72)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Carsten René Beul (Neuwied, Germany) (represented initially by K.-G Stümper, then by H.-M. Pott and T. Eckhold, lawyers)
Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: P. Schonard and D. Warin, acting as Agents) and Council of the European Union (represented by R. Weimann and N. Rouam, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of Regulation (EU) No 537/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on specific requirements regarding statutory audit of public-interest entities and repealing Commission Decision 2005/909/EC (OJ 2014 L 158, p. 77).
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.There is no need to adjudicate on the European Commission’s application for leave to intervene.
3.Mr Carsten René Beul shall bear his own costs and shall pay those incurred by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union.
4.The Commission and the Parliament shall bear their own costs relating to the application to intervene.
(1) OJ C 409, 17.11.2014.