- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-140/22, mBank (Consumer declaration): Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 December 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy — Śródmieścia w Warszawie — Poland) — SM, KM v mBank S.A. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) — Effects of a finding that a term is unfair — Mortgage loan agreement indexed to a foreign currency containing unfair terms concerning the exchange rate — Nullity of that contract — Claims for restitution — Statutory interest — Limitation period)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CA0140
62022CA0140
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
Series C
C/2024/919
29.1.2024
(Case C-140/22, (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>) mBank (Consumer declaration))
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Consumer protection - Directive 93/13/EEC - Unfair terms in consumer contracts - Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) - Effects of a finding that a term is unfair - Mortgage loan agreement indexed to a foreign currency containing unfair terms concerning the exchange rate - Nullity of that contract - Claims for restitution - Statutory interest - Limitation period)
(C/2024/919)
Language of the case: Polish
Referring court
Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy-Śródmieścia w Warszawie
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: SM, KM
Defendant: mBank S.A.
Intervening party: Rzecznik Finansowy
Operative part of the judgment
Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts must be interpreted as meaning that, in the context of the cancellation, in its entirety, of a mortgage loan agreement concluded with a consumer by a banking institution on the ground that that agreement contains an unfair term without which it cannot continue in existence:
they preclude the judicial interpretation of national law according to which the exercise of the rights which that consumer draws from that directive is conditional on the lodging, by that consumer, before a court, of a declaration by which he or she states, first, not to consent to that unfair term remaining effective, secondly, to be aware of the fact that the nullity of that term entails the cancellation of that agreement and, moreover, of the consequences of that cancellation and, thirdly, to consent to the cancellation of that agreement;
they preclude the compensation sought by the consumer concerned in respect of the restitution of the sums paid by him or her in the performance of the agreement at issue being reduced by the equivalent of the interest which that banking institution would have received if that agreement had remained in force.
*
Language of the case: Polish.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/919/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)