I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
—
(2020/C 27/69)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Dvectis CZ s.r.o. (Brno, Czech Republic) (represented by: J. Svojanovská, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Yado s.r.o. (Handlová, Slovakia)
Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Design at issue: Registered Community design No 3222 504-0001
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 September 2019 in Case R 513/2018-3
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order that the defendant bears the applicant’s costs in these proceedings.
If the Court does not agree with the above-stated proposal, the applicant requests to:
—change the contested decision in a way that the appeal of the applicant of 21 March 2018 is fully upheld and the design at issue remains valid;
—order that the defendant bears the applicant’s costs in these proceedings.
—Infringement of the essential procedural requirements.
—