I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2022/C 284/70)
Language of the case: French
Applicant: Unsa Énergie (Bagnolet, France) (represented by: M.-P. Ogel, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the letter of the European Commission COMP B.2/NP/mm *comp(2022)2975325 of 8 April 2022, by which the Commission rejects the complaint as inadmissible,
—order the Commission to pay the costs.
In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 1(h) of Regulation 2015/1589, (1) on the ground that the Commission misconstrued the concept of interested party. The applicant submits that the Commission disregards the case-law according to which a trade union could be categorised as having the status of interested party where it is shown that that trade union’s interests might be affected by the granting of State aid.
2.Second plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 24 of Regulation 2015/1589 and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. According to the applicant, the Commission failed to examine its complaint or request it to provide details as regards that complaint, in breach of Article 24 of Regulation 2015/1589 which confers various rights on interested parties.
Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 of 13 July 2015 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (OJ 2015 L 248, p. 9).