- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-391/19: Action brought on 27 June 2019 — Vinci v Parliament
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TN0391
62019TN0391
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
12.8.2019
Official Journal of the European Union
C 270/50
(Case T-391/19)
(2019/C 270/52)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Luigi Vinci (Milan, Italy) (represented by: M. Merola, lawyer)
Defendant: European Parliament
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—declare non existent or annul in its entirety the measure of which the applicant was informed by means of the contested communication, in which the European Parliament redetermined retirement pension rights and ordered recovery of the amount paid on the basis of the earlier pension calculation;
—order the European Parliament to refund all the sums unduly withheld, and to pay statutory interest from the date of withholding to the date of payment and order the European Parliament to implement the judgment and undertake all the necessary initiatives, acts or measures to ensure the immediate, full re-establishment of the original pension amount;
—order the European Parliament to pay the costs of the legal proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those raised in Case T-389/19 Coppo Gavazzi v Parliament.