EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal - 13 May 2015#Todorova Androva v Council#Case F-78/12

ECLI:EU:F:2013:206

62012FO0078

May 13, 2015
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

ORDER OF THE EUROPEAN UNION CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL (Second Chamber)

13 May 2015 (*1)

(Rectification of the judgment)

In Case F‑78/12,

ACTION brought under Article 270 TFEU, applicable to the EAEC Treaty pursuant to Article 106a thereof,

Viara Todorova Androva, an official of the Council of the European Union, residing in Rhode-Saint-Genèse (Belgium), represented by M. Velardo, lawyer,

applicant,

Council of the European Union, represented by J. Herrmann and M. Bauer, acting as Agents,

defendant,

supported by

European Commission, represented by J. Currall and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents,

Court of Auditors of the European Union, represented initially by T. Kennedy, N. Scafarto and K. Zavřelová, acting as Agents, and subsequently by N. Scafarto, acting as Agent,

interveners,

THE CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL (Second Chamber)

composed of K. Bradley (Rapporteur), President, H. Kreppel and M.I. Rofes i Pujol, Judges,

Registrar: W. Hakenberg,

makes the following

1On 29 April 2015, the Tribunal (Second Chamber) delivered its judgment in Todorova Androva v Council (F‑78/12, EU:F:2015:37).

2The headwords of the judgment contain an obvious clerical error within the meaning of Article 122(1) of the Rules of Procedure. As such a clerical error does not concern the operative part or one of the grounds constituting the necessary support for the operative part, the judgment should be rectified of the Tribunal’s own motion, in accordance with the instructions given in the operative part of this order.

On those grounds,

THE CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL (Second Chamber)

hereby orders:

In the headwords of the judgment of 29 April 2015 in Todorova Androva v Council (F‑78/12, EU:F:2015:37), the reference to the Framework agreement concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP shall be amended as follows:

‘on fixed-term work’.

The original of this order shall be annexed to the original of the rectified judgment. A note of the order shall be made in the margin of the original of the judgment.

Luxembourg, 13 May 2015.

W. Hakenberg

K. Bradley

Registrar

President

*

Language of the case: French.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia