I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Community trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Community figurative mark GRANUflex – Previous company name and business name GRANUFLEX – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(4) and Article 52(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(4) and Article 53(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Community trade mark – Surrender, revocation and invalidity – Relative grounds of invalidity – Registration contrary to Article 8(4) of Regulation No 40/94 (Council Regulation No 40/94, Arts 8(4) and 52(1)(c)) (see paras 35-38)
ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 September 2008 (Case R 1277/2007-2), relating to invalidity proceedings between Granuflex Ipari és Kereskedelmi Kft and Granuband BV.
Registered Community trade mark of which cancellation sought:
Figurative mark GRANUFLEX for goods in Classes 17, 19 and 27 – Community trade mark No 943118
Proprietor of the Community trade mark:
Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark:
Granuflex Ipari és Kereskedelmi Kft
Trade mark of the party seeking cancellation:
Commercial designation GRANUFLEX for goods and services in Classes 17, 19, 27 and 37
Decision of the Cancellation Division:
Community trade mark annulled
Decision of the Board of Appeal:
Appeal dismissed
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Granuband BV to pay the costs.