- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-329/22, Zamestnik izpalnitelen direktor na Darzhaven fond ‘Zemedelie’ (Organic beekeeping): Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 7 December 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad — Bulgaria) — Zamestnik izpalnitelen direktor na Darzhaven fond ‘Zemedelie’ v IW (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Agriculture — European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) funding — Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 — Support for rural development — Article 29(3) — Organic farming — Financial support for organic in-conversion production — Concepts of ‘initial period’ and ‘conversion period’ — Regulation (EC) No 889/2008 — Organic beekeeping — Minimum conversion period — Article 38(3) — Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 — Article 17 — Conversion)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CA0329
62022CA0329
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
Series C
C/2024/920
(Case C-329/22, (1) Zamestnik izpalnitelen direktor na Darzhaven fond ‘Zemedelie’ (Organic beekeeping))
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Agriculture - European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) funding - Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 - Support for rural development - Article 29(3) - Organic farming - Financial support for organic in-conversion production - Concepts of ‘initial period’ and ‘conversion period’ - Regulation (EC) No 889/2008 - Organic beekeeping - Minimum conversion period - Article 38(3) - Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 - Article 17 - Conversion)
(C/2024/920)
Language of the case: Bulgarian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Zamestnik izpalnitelen direktor na Darzhaven fond ‘Zemedelie’
Defendant: IW
Operative part of the judgment
The second sentence of Article 29(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005
must be interpreted as meaning that:
it does not preclude a national provision which limits the possibility of receiving financial support for conversion to organic beekeeping to the minimum conversion period referred to in Article 38(3) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 889/2008 of 5 September 2008 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 on organic production and labelling of organic products with regard to organic production, labelling and control;
in that way, Member States may set a maximum duration for the grant of support for conversion to organic farming, by aligning themselves with the specific conversion period which, in accordance with Article 17(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 of 28 June 2007 on organic production and labelling of organic products and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91, is defined by EU legislation solely on the basis of the type of crop or animal production;
Member States may thus decide that conversion to organic farming may give rise to support for a period shorter than that of five to seven years provided for in the first sentence of Article 29(3) of Regulation No 1305/2013.
(1) OJ C 340, 5.9.2022
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/920/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)