EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-754/22: Order of the General Court of 11 December 2023 — Nieß v EUIPO — Terrasoverkapping-inkoop.nl (GARTENLÜX) (EU trademark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark GARTENLÜX — Previous company name and business name GARTENLUX — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TB0754

62022TB0754

December 11, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

Series C

C/2024/2033

18.3.2024

(Case T-754/22) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(EU trademark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark GARTENLÜX - Previous company name and business name GARTENLUX - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(C/2024/2033)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Andrea Nieß (Kempen, Germany) (represented by: A. Erlenhardt, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Ringelhann and D. Stoyanova-Valchanova, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Terrasoverkapping-inkoop.nl BV (Venlo, Netherlands) (represented by: O. Möhring, lawyer)

Re:

By her action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 16 September 2022 (Case R 607/2022-2).

Operative part of the order

1.The action is dismissed.

2.Ms Andrea Nieß shall bear her own costs and pay those incurred by Terrasoverkapping-inkoop.nl BV.

3.The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs.

(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 24, 23.1.2023.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2033/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

END

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia