I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Appeal - Action for annulment - Inadmissibility - Measure not having binding legal effects - European Communities' own resources - Infringement procedure - Article 11 of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1150/2000 - Interest for late payment - Negotiations for an agreement on a conditional payment - Refusal letter)
(2008/C 22/34)
Language of the case: Finnish
Applicant: Republic of Finland (represented by: E. Bygglin, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Wilms and P. Aalto, Agents)
Appeal against the order of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 5 September 2006 in Case T-350/05 Finland v Commission dismissing as inadmissible an application for annulment of the Commission's decision of 8 July 2005 refusing to enter into negotiations with the Republic of Finland on the possibility of paying provisionally the customs duties on defence equipment claimed by the Commission in proceedings for failure to fulfil obligations — Acts against which an action may be brought
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders the Republic of Finland to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 326, 30.12.2006.