I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(Law governing the institutions - Member of Parliament - Psychological harassment - Decisions of the President of the Parliament finding that an accredited parliamentary assistant suffered psychological harassment and imposing on a Member the penalty of forfeiture of entitlement to the subsistence allowance for 10 days - Right to be heard - Rights of the defence)
(C/2025/2374)
Language of the case: French
Applicant: Monica Semedo (Grevenmacher, Luxembourg) (represented by: T. Bontinck, A. Guillerme and L. Marchal, lawyers)
Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: D. Boytha, N. Görlitz and A. Krachler, acting as Agents)
By her action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decisions of the European Parliament of 17 April 2023 by which the Parliament, in the first place, found that certain acts which she was alleged to have engaged in, taken individually and as a whole, constituted psychological harassment within the meaning of Article 12a(3) of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and, in the second place, imposed on her a penalty consisting in the forfeiture of entitlement to the subsistence allowance for a period of 10 days.
The Court:
1.Annuls the decisions of the President of the European Parliament of 17 April 2023 by which the President, in the first place, found that certain acts which Ms Monica Semedo was alleged to have engaged in constituted psychological harassment and, in the second place, imposed on Ms Semedo a penalty consisting in the forfeiture of entitlement to the subsistence allowance for a period of 10 days;
2.Orders the Parliament to pay the costs.
—
(1) OJ C 321, 11.9.2023.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2374/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—