EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-349/23: Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2025 – Semedo v Parliament (Law governing the institutions – Member of Parliament – Psychological harassment – Decisions of the President of the Parliament finding that an accredited parliamentary assistant suffered psychological harassment and imposing on a Member the penalty of forfeiture of entitlement to the subsistence allowance for 10 days – Right to be heard – Rights of the defence)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TA0349

62023TA0349

March 12, 2025
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2025/2374

28.4.2025

(Case T-349/23)

(Law governing the institutions - Member of Parliament - Psychological harassment - Decisions of the President of the Parliament finding that an accredited parliamentary assistant suffered psychological harassment and imposing on a Member the penalty of forfeiture of entitlement to the subsistence allowance for 10 days - Right to be heard - Rights of the defence)

(C/2025/2374)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Monica Semedo (Grevenmacher, Luxembourg) (represented by: T. Bontinck, A. Guillerme and L. Marchal, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: D. Boytha, N. Görlitz and A. Krachler, acting as Agents)

Re:

By her action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decisions of the European Parliament of 17 April 2023 by which the Parliament, in the first place, found that certain acts which she was alleged to have engaged in, taken individually and as a whole, constituted psychological harassment within the meaning of Article 12a(3) of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and, in the second place, imposed on her a penalty consisting in the forfeiture of entitlement to the subsistence allowance for a period of 10 days.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Annuls the decisions of the President of the European Parliament of 17 April 2023 by which the President, in the first place, found that certain acts which Ms Monica Semedo was alleged to have engaged in constituted psychological harassment and, in the second place, imposed on Ms Semedo a penalty consisting in the forfeiture of entitlement to the subsistence allowance for a period of 10 days;

2.Orders the Parliament to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 321, 11.9.2023.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2374/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia