I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
—
2011/C 269/79
Language of the case: English
Appellant: Longevity Health Products, Inc. (represented by: J. Korab, Rechtsanwalt)
Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Admit the complaint filed by the company Longevity Health Products, Inc.;
—Annul the decision of the General Court of April 15, 2011, T-95/11;
—Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to pay the costs.
The applicant submits that the contested order should be annulled on the following grounds:
—The reasoning of the General Court is defective;
—The General Court did not consider the arguments advanced by the holder of the trade mark.
—