- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-593/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 13 October 2017 — Kreyenhop & Kluge GmbH & Co. KG v Hauptzollamt Hannover
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017CN0593
62017CN0593
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
29.1.2018
Official Journal of the European Union
C 32/12
(Case C-593/17)
(2018/C 032/18)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Kreyenhop & Kluge GmbH & Co. KG
Defendant: Hauptzollamt Hannover
Questions referred
1.Is Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 767/2014 of 11 July 2014 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature valid?
2.If the answer to the first question is in the negative: Is the European Commission’s explanatory note to subheading 1902 3010 of the Combined Nomenclature, which was published on 4 March 2015, to be taken into consideration in the interpretation of subheading 1902 3010 of the CN in so far as frying is mentioned in that note as an example of an industrial drying process?
Language of the case: German
(1) OJ 2014 L 209, p. 12.
* * *