I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
—
(2015/C 302/24)
Language of the case: English
Appellant: SolarWorld AG (represented by: L. Ruessmann, avocat, J. Beck, Solicitor)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission, Solsonica SpA
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Declare the Appeal admissible and well-founded;
—Set aside the General Court’s order in Case T-393/13 with regard to the General Court’s findings that there is no longer a need to adjudicate the Applications for annulment and damages;
—Declare the Application for annulment and the action for damages in Case T-393/13 admissible; and
—Refer the case back to the General Court for a decision on the substance of the Application for annulment and the action for damages.
The appellant submits that the General Court manifestly erred in finding that there was no longer a need to adjudicate on its action for annulment and its action for damages.
—