I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-94/15 RENV) (*)
(Production and labelling of organic products - Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 - Amendments to Regulation (EC) No 889/2008 - Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1358/2014 - Prohibition of hormones - Non-renewal of the transitional period concerning aquaculture animals provided for in Article 95(11) of Regulation No 889/2008 - Methods of reproduction - Exceptional authorisation to collect wild aquaculture juveniles for on-growing purposes - Equal treatment)
(2019/C 305/37)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: Binca Seafoods GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: H. Schmidt, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Lewis, G. von Rintelen and K. Walkerová, Agents)
Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1358/2014 of 18 December 2014 amending Regulation (EC) No 889/2008 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 as regards the origin of organic aquaculture animals, aquaculture husbandry practices, feed for organic aquaculture animals and products and substances allowed for use in organic aquaculture (OJ 2014 L 365, p. 97).
1.The action is dismissed.
2.Binca Seafoods GmbH is ordered to pay the costs relating to the proceedings before the General Court and before the Court of Justice.
(*) Language of the case: German.
ECLI:EU:C:2019:140
* * *