- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-364/18: Judgment of the General Court of 23 May 2019 — Arçelik v EUIPO (MicroGarden) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark MicroGarden — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptiveness — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TA0364
62018TA0364
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
15.7.2019
Official Journal of the European Union
C 238/18
(Case T-364/18) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
(EU trade mark - Application for the EU word mark MicroGarden - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptiveness - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2019/C 238/22)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Arçelik AS (Istanbul, Turkey) (represented by: A. Franke and E. Flach, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Sliwinska, S. Palmero Cabezas and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 April 2018 (Case R 163/2018-2), relating to an application for registration of the word sign MicroGarden as an EU trade mark.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Arçelik AS to pay the costs.
(<span class="note"> <a id="ntr1-C_2019238EN.01001801-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2019238EN.01001801-E0001">*1</a> </span>) OJ C 268, 30.7.2018.