- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-91/14: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 12 May 2016 — Chatel v Council (Civil service — Officials — Pensions — Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations — Pension rights acquired, before entering the service of the European Union, under a national pension scheme — Transfer to the EU’s pension scheme — Proposal concerning additional pensionable years, accepted by the applicant, based on new General Implementing Provisions — Concept of measure adversely affecting a person — Manifest inadmissibility — Article 81 of the Rules of procedure)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014FB0091
62014FB0091
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 222/43
(Case F-91/14) (*)
((Civil service - Officials - Pensions - Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations - Pension rights acquired, before entering the service of the European Union, under a national pension scheme - Transfer to the EU’s pension scheme - Proposal concerning additional pensionable years, accepted by the applicant, based on new General Implementing Provisions - Concept of measure adversely affecting a person - Manifest inadmissibility - Article 81 of the Rules of procedure))
(2016/C 222/56)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Zlata Chatel (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: initially D. de Abreu Caldas, M. de Abreu Caldas and J.-N. Louis, lawyers, then D. de Abreu Caldas and J.-N. Louis, lawyers, and, finally, J.-N. Louis, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and E. Rebasti, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of the decision concerning the transfer of the applicants’ pension rights to the European Union pension scheme applying the new GIP relating to Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible.
2.Each party shall bear its own costs.
(*) Language of the case: French.
OJ C 421 of 24/11/2014, p. 63.