- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-542/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) (Latvia) lodged on 30 August 2021 — SIA Mikrotīkls v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CN0542
62021CN0542
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
15.11.2021
Official Journal of the European Union
C 462/26
(Case C-542/21)
(2021/C 462/31)
Language of the case: Latvian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant at first instance and appellant: SIA Mikrotīkls
Defendant at first instance and respondent: Valsts ieņēmumu dienests
Question referred
Must the combined nomenclature in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, (1) as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 927/2012 (2) of 9 October 2012 and Commission Implementing Regulation No 1001/2013 (3) of 4 October 2013, be interpreted as meaning that subheading 8517 70 11 of the combined nomenclature can include router aerials configured for use in local area networks (LAN) and/or wide area networks (WAN)?
Language of the case: Latvian
(1) OJ 1987 L 256, p. 1.
(2) Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 927/2012 of 9 October 2012 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ 2012 L 304, p. 1).
(3) Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1001/2013 of 4 October 2013 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ 2013 L 290, p. 1).