I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-158/21) (*)
(Law governing the institutions - European citizens’ initiative - ‘Minority SafePack — one million signatures for diversity in Europe’ - Commission communication setting out the reasons for not adopting the proposals for legal acts contained in the European citizens’ initiative - Obligation to state reasons - Equal treatment - Principle of sound administration - Manifest error of assessment)
(2023/C 15/47)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Citizens’ Committee of the European Citizens’ Initiative ‘Minority SafePack — one million signatures for diversity in Europe’ (represented by T. Hieber, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by I. Martínez del Peral, I. Rubene, E. Stamate and D. Drambozova, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the applicant: Hungary (represented by M. Fehér and K. Szíjjártó, acting as Agents)
Interveners in support of the defendant: Hellenic Republic (represented by T. Papadopoulou, acting as Agent), Slovak Republic (represented by E. Drugda, acting as Agent)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Commission Communication C(2021) 171 final of 14 January 2021 on the European Citizens’ Initiative entitled ‘Minority SafePack — one million signatures for diversity in Europe’.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders the Citizens’ Committee of the European Citizens’ Initiative ‘Minority SafePack — one million signatures for diversity in Europe’ to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;
3.Orders the Hellenic Republic, Hungary and the Slovak Republic to each bear their own costs.
(*) Language of the case: English.