EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-155/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank ’s-Gravenhage, sitting at Zwolle-Lelystad (Netherlands) lodged on 31 March 2011 — Bibi Mohammad Imran v Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011CN0155

62011CN0155

March 31, 2011
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

23.7.2011

Official Journal of the European Union

C 219/2

(Case C-155/11)

2011/C 219/02

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Bibi Mohammad Imran

Respondent: Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken

Questions referred

1.Does Article 7(2) of the Family Reunification Directive allow a Member State to refuse entry and residence to a family member, as referred to in Article 4 of the Family Reunification Directive, of a third country national lawfully residing in that Member State, exclusively on the ground that that family member has not passed the integration examination abroad as prescribed in the legislation of that Member State?

2.Is it important in answering Question 1 that the family member concerned is a mother of eight, of whom seven are minors, lawfully residing in that Member State?

3.Is it important in answering Question 1 whether, in the country of residence, accessible tuition is available to the family member in the language of that Member State?

4.Is it important in answering Question 1 whether the family member concerned, given his or her educational background and personal circumstances, particularly medical problems, would be able to pass that examination in the near future?

5.Is it important in answering Question 1 that no reviews take place in respect of the provisions of Article 5(5) and Article 17 of the Family Reunification Directive, Article 24 of the Charter or the principle of proportionality as contained in European Union law?

6.Is it important in answering Question 1 that nationals of certain other third countries are exempt, purely on the basis of their nationality, from the obligation to pass the civic examination abroad?

Council Directive 2003/86/EC of 22 September 2003 on the right to family reunification (OJ 2003 L 251, p. 12).

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia