EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-76/24: Judgment of the General Court of 4 June 2025 – Benschop v EUIPO – Seven Bell Group (ALWAYS RUN 4PRESIDENT) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark ALWAYS RUN 4PRESIDENT – Earlier EU figurative mark PRESIDENT’s – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Enhanced distinctiveness of the earlier mark acquired through use)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TA0076

62024TA0076

June 4, 2025
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2025/3898

21.7.2025

(Case T-76/24)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark ALWAYS RUN 4PRESIDENT - Earlier EU figurative mark PRESIDENT’s - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Enhanced distinctiveness of the earlier mark acquired through use)

(C/2025/3898)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Sven Benschop (Montfoort, Netherlands) (represented by: T. Berendsen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Stoyanova-Valchanova, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Seven Bell Group (Campi Bisenzio, Italy) (represented by: M. De Vietro, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 14 December 2023 (Case R 1341/2023-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 14 December 2023 (Case R 1341/2023-2);

2.Rejects the opposition brought by Seven Bell Group;

3.Orders EUIPO and Seven Bell Group to pay the costs.

OJ C, C/2024/2327, 2.4.2024.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3898/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia